When you purchase products or services through our links we earn a small commission. Thank you.
Analogies and False Equivalence
Characteristics of the False Equivalence argument
This fallacy is committed when one shared trait between two subjects is assumed to show equivalence, especially in order of magnitude, when equivalence is not necessarily the logical result. False equivalence is a common result when an anecdotal similarity is pointed out as equal, but the claim of equivalence does not bear scrutiny because the similarity is based on oversimplification or ignorance of additional factors. The pattern of the fallacy is often as such:
If A is the set of C and D, and B is the set of D and E, then since they both contain D, A and B are equal.
“D” is not required to exist in both sets; only a passing similarity is required to cause this fallacy to be used.
Examples of False Equivalence statements
The following statements are examples of false equivalence:
- “The Deepwater Horizon oil spill is no more harmful than when your neighbor drips some oil on the ground when changing his car’s oil.”
- The “false equivalence” is the comparison between things differing by many orders of magnitude:Deepwater Horizon spilled 210 million US gal (790 million L) of oil; one’s neighbor might spill perhaps 1 US pt (0.47 L).
- “They are both felidae, mammals in the order Carnivora, therefore there’s little difference between having a pet cat and a pet jaguar.”
- The “false equivalence” is in an oversimplification of the factors that make an animal a suitable pet.
- “Consuming marijuana can lead to consuming and acquiring a psychological dependence on heroin later in life by acting as a gateway drug, so taking marijuana is like taking heroin”
- The “false equivalence” is not considering the difference in likelihood. Consuming heroin is more likely to lead to future heroin dependence than taking marijuana.
Negative causes of the False Equivalence fallacy
Thomas Patterson of the Shorenstein Center for Media, Politics, and Public Policy at Harvard University wrote about the false equivalency used by the media during the 2016 United States presidential election:
[F]alse equivalencies are developing on a grand scale as a result of relentlessly negative news. If everything and everyone is portrayed negatively, there’s a leveling effect that opens the door to charlatans. The press historically has helped citizens recognize the difference between the earnest politician and the pretender. Today’s news coverage blurs the distinction.
Leave A Comment
🏈 Fantasy Football Advice 🏈
🇺🇸 Elections & Politics 🇺🇸
The truth on matters that affect our democracy…
💵 UBI & Economy 💵
Uncommon common sense on policies and issues that affect America’s economic outlook…
🚨 Healthcare & Economy 🚨
Sick societies have unproductive economies. Let’s not have an unproductive economy…
Featured Offers From Our Affiliates
Our list of recommended books for the curious mind.
If you’re looking for a timeless piece that you can wear anytime and look good — without breaking the bank — one of these watches might be the perfect watch for you.