When you make purchases through our links we may earn a small commission.
Photo Credit: instagram.com/thesmokingchair
In evaluating quarterback prospects for the 2025 NFL Draft, the time it takes for a quarterback to release the ball from the moment of the snap—known as “time to throw”—is a critical metric. A quicker release can neutralize defensive pressure, reduce sack rates, and enhance offensive rhythm.
In the NFL, average time to throw typically falls between 2.5 and 3.0 seconds, with elite quarterbacks like Patrick Mahomes, Joe Burrow, and Tua Tagovailoa often excelling in the quicker range. This stat not only reflects the quarterback’s ability to process defenses but also highlights the effectiveness of the offensive line and the scheme in place. A quick release can mask protection issues, while slower release times often correlate with higher sack rates and increased pressure.
Quarterbacks with faster release times tend to perform better in timing-based offenses, such as West Coast schemes, where short, quick passes keep the chains moving and prevent defenses from gaining momentum. On the other hand, quarterbacks with longer release times often rely on deep passing concepts or extended plays, which can result in more explosive plays but also increase risk.
As NFL teams evaluate prospects, understanding each quarterback’s average time to throw helps determine how seamlessly they can transition into professional systems. Below is a ranking of draft-eligible quarterbacks by their average time to throw during the 2024 season:
McCord led his peers with the fastest average time to throw at 2.41 seconds. His ability to make quick decisions and deliver the ball promptly was evident throughout the season. However, his aggressive playstyle resulted in a high number of both big-time throws and turnover-worthy plays, indicating a risk-reward approach. Despite the occasional recklessness, his quick trigger helped Syracuse maintain an efficient passing attack, especially against blitz-heavy defenses. (Source: Seahawks Draft Blog)
Rourke demonstrated efficiency with an average time to throw of 2.56 seconds. His quick release contributed to a balanced offensive attack, allowing him to navigate defenses effectively. Known for his poise under pressure, Rourke excelled at hitting short and intermediate routes while keeping the chains moving. His ability to quickly identify hot routes made him particularly effective against aggressive pass rushes. (Source: Seahawks Draft Blog)
Ewers maintained an average time to throw of 2.59 seconds. Despite facing challenges, including injuries and a high number of turnover-worthy plays, his quick release remains a notable aspect of his game. Ewers’ sharp decision-making allowed Texas to maintain offensive tempo, though his deep ball accuracy and occasional forced throws highlight areas for improvement. (Source: Seahawks Draft Blog)
Howard’s average time to throw was 2.66 seconds. He possesses ideal NFL size and is not hesitant to throw on the run, showcasing above-average arm strength. However, some inconsistencies with his release point affect his accuracy. When given a clean pocket, Howard’s quick trigger and ability to make off-platform throws stood out, though his struggles under pressure remain a concern. (Source: PFF)
Cook recorded an average time to throw of 2.74 seconds. His performance reflects a balance between quick decision-making and allowing plays to develop, contributing to his offensive unit’s effectiveness. Cook’s comfort in the pocket and ability to progress through reads quickly made him a consistent performer, though his deep ball remains a work in progress. (Source: Seahawks Draft Blog)
Brosmer’s average time to throw stood at 2.77 seconds. His ability to release the ball efficiently has been a key factor in his offensive production. Brosmer’s quick processing and rhythm-based passing game allowed New Hampshire to sustain drives, though his performance under duress revealed occasional flaws in mechanics. (Source: Seahawks Draft Blog)
Dart averaged 2.78 seconds per throw. Known for his accuracy and athleticism, he led the nation with 10.8 yards per pass attempt, indicating a propensity for making significant plays downfield. Dart’s quick trigger on RPOs and play-action passes stood out, though he occasionally held the ball too long when his first read was covered. (Source: Rotoballer)
Gabriel’s average time to throw was 2.79 seconds. Despite concerns about his height and arm strength, his quick movements and fast release, complemented by rapid footwork, enable him to evade pressure effectively. Gabriel’s ability to keep plays alive while maintaining a quick release made him a consistent threat in Oregon’s up-tempo offense. (Source: PFF)
Leonard posted an average time to throw of 2.82 seconds. As a dual-threat quarterback with notable physical tools, he has shown the ability to extend plays and make quick decisions under pressure. Leonard’s quick release allowed Notre Dame to lean on short passing concepts, though his deep ball accuracy remains inconsistent. (Source: Seahawks Draft Blog)
Henigan’s average time to throw was 2.84 seconds. His performance at the Senior Bowl highlighted his quick decision-making and efficient release, enhancing his draft stock. Henigan’s ability to get the ball out quickly kept Memphis’ offense on schedule, though his tendency to force throws under pressure is an area for improvement. (Source: Seahawks Draft Blog)
Milroe averaged 2.88 seconds per throw. While his athleticism and dual-threat capability are evident, there is a significant variance in his accuracy and decision-making, impacting his release time. Milroe’s quick release on designed plays was impressive, but he often held the ball longer when forced off-script. (Source: PFF)
Shough’s average time to throw was 2.93 seconds. His arm strength and release are notable strengths, but areas for improvement include footwork and success against pressure. Shough’s ability to deliver quick strikes was evident in clean pockets, though he struggled when forced to move off his spot. (Source: Reddit)
Ward also recorded an average time to throw of 2.93 seconds. His playmaking mentality and escapability allow him to extend plays, though his varied release points can lead to inconsistencies in accuracy. Ward’s quick decision-making on short throws stood out, but his desire to extend plays sometimes led to unnecessary sacks. (Source: PFF)
Sanders had an average time to throw of 3.00 seconds. Despite operating behind an offensive line that often required him to extend plays, he maintained high accuracy and avoided turnovers, showcasing his poise under pressure. Sanders’ quick release on intermediate throws was impressive, though his deep ball timing could improve. (Source: PFF)
While average time to throw is a significant indicator of how well a quarterback might transition into the NFL, it is just one piece of a larger puzzle. Based on historical data and scouting evaluations, the top five predictive variables for NFL quarterback success include:
Time to Throw: A quick release (under 2.7 seconds) reflects fast processing, anticipation, and rhythm passing. It enables quarterbacks to thrive in systems that rely on timing and minimizes exposure to defensive pressure. NFL starters who consistently perform well in this metric tend to have longer careers and more consistent production.
Decision-Making Efficiency: Processing speed and sound decision-making go hand in hand with release time. Quarterbacks who quickly diagnose defenses, identify coverages, and make the correct reads are more likely to transition smoothly into the NFL. This is often measured by turnover-worthy plays versus big-time throws.
Pocket Presence and Mobility: A quarterback’s ability to navigate the pocket while keeping their eyes downfield is crucial. Mobility allows them to extend plays, but controlled pocket movement prevents unnecessary sacks and maintains offensive flow. Quarterbacks like Joe Burrow and Jalen Hurts excel in this area.
Accuracy Under Pressure: Throwing accuracy when the pocket collapses is a strong predictor of NFL success. Quarterbacks who maintain precision while under duress often perform better as competition increases. This metric separates college standouts from those who can succeed at the professional level.
Leadership and Football IQ: Intangible qualities such as leadership, pre-snap recognition, and adaptability play a significant role in NFL success. Quarterbacks who can adjust protections, identify blitzes, and exploit defensive weaknesses tend to thrive in complex NFL systems.
While each of these factors contributes to a quarterback’s potential, the ability to process information quickly and release the ball efficiently remains one of the most reliable indicators of future success. NFL teams will continue to prioritize quarterbacks who combine quick decision-making with accuracy, poise, and leadership as they evaluate talent for the next level.
You’ll get more articles like this – and our favorite promotional offers delivered straight to your inbox.
By submitting this form you agree to our terms and conditions. You can unsubscribe at any time.
If You Can’t Afford $9 to Drive Around Manhattan, You Can’t Afford to Drive Around Manhattan
Congestion pricing has finally untangled Manhattan’s gridlock, saving time for commuters and clearing the air. If $9 a day feels unaffordable, it might be time to rethink whether city driving is practical.
BREAKING: IRS UNCOVERS TRILLIONS IN UNPAID TAXES FROM WEALTHY ELITES
A shocking IRS report exposes massive tax evasion among the ultra-wealthy, with trillions in unpaid taxes over the past decade. Lawmakers demand urgent action.
The F-Files: Unmasking the Misidentification of a Fallen Pilot
When tragedy strikes, misinformation spreads fast. A viral wave of false claims misidentified a fallen Black Hawk pilot, linking her to a transgender woman and a former White House aide. This F-Files investigation breaks down the truth, the logical fallacies used, and the dangers of unchecked social media narratives.
The D Files: Haley’s Role Model
Did Nikki Haley really call Hillary Clinton her “role model”? A political ad says yes—but the truth tells a different story. This fact-check uncovers the selective editing, logical fallacies, and the role of social media in distorting political narratives.
To ‘Drill, Baby, Drill’ Big Oil Is Saying ‘No, Thanks’
Despite political calls for more drilling, Big Oil is resisting. Instead of expanding operations, major oil companies are prioritizing stock buybacks, dividends, and a cautious approach to long-term investments. Learn why the oil industry is reluctant to drill more, even as energy prices remain high.
Why Even the Smartest Minds Fall for Disinformation Campaigns
Why do even the smartest minds fall for disinformation? Cognitive biases, emotional manipulation, and social group dynamics all play a role. Discover the psychological factors that make humans susceptible to misinformation and practical strategies to stay informed and critically aware.
