When you purchase products or services through our links we and our partners earn a small commission. Thank you.

10 Examples of an Ad Hominem Logical Fallacy

Fallacies of logic, such as the ad hominem fallacy, can play a significant role in spreading disinformation. By attacking the character or credibility of a source rather than addressing the evidence or logic of their argument, disinformation can be spread by discrediting the source or dismissing their claims as false or biased. Fallacies of logic can also be used to create false narratives and sow confusion, making it difficult for people to separate fact from fiction. Additionally, fallacies can be used to manipulate people by appealing to their emotions rather than their reason. Fallacies of logic can be a powerful tool for spreading disinformation, as it can make it difficult for people to identify and reject false information.

🔷 Join The Smoking Chair on Facebook
🇺🇸 Join Partisan For The People on Facebook
🔶 Follow The Smoking Chair on Instagram

What is an Ad Hominem Fallacy?

An ad hominem fallacy is a type of logical fallacy that occurs when someone attacks the character, motive, or other personal attribute of the person making an argument, rather than addressing the substance of the argument itself. Ad hominem is a Latin phrase that means “to the man” or “against the man”. The ad hominem fallacy is a form of argumentative strategy in which an attack on the person making the argument is substituted for an attack on the substance of the argument. The purpose of this attack is to undermine the credibility or trustworthiness of the person making the argument, rather than addressing the actual evidence or logic of the argument. This is considered a logical fallacy because it is an attempt to distract from the real issue at hand and it can be used in any subject matter.

10 Examples of an Ad Hominem Fallacy

“You can’t trust John’s argument on the issue of climate change, he’s just a tree hugger who wants to shut down all industry.” This is an ad hominem attack because it attempts to undermine John’s argument by attacking his character or personal beliefs, rather than addressing the actual evidence or logic of his argument.
“Samantha’s proposal for a new city ordinance is ridiculous. She’s just a busybody who wants to control every aspect of people’s lives.” This is an ad hominem attack because it attempts to undermine Samantha’s proposal by implying that she is overbearing and controlling, rather than discussing the merits of the proposal itself.
“Bill’s criticism of the new tax plan is just sour grapes because he didn’t come up with it himself.” This is an ad hominem attack because it attempts to undermine Bill’s criticism by suggesting that he is motivated by jealousy or resentment, rather than addressing the substance of his argument.
“Of course Jane’s research on the health effects of this new drug is flawed, she’s just a shill for the pharmaceutical industry.” This is an ad hominem attack because it attempts to undermine Jane’s research by implying that she is biased or dishonest, rather than evaluating the evidence she presents.
“Bob’s opinion on the new law is irrelevant, he’s just a criminal who doesn’t care about the law.” This is an ad hominem attack because it attempts to undermine Bob’s opinion by suggesting that his background makes him unqualified to have an opinion on the matter, rather than addressing the validity of his argument.
“Don’t listen to Sarah’s argument on gun control, she’s just a bleeding heart liberal who wants to take away our rights.” This is an ad hominem attack because it attempts to undermine Sarah’s argument by attacking her political beliefs, rather than addressing the logic and evidence of her argument.
“Mike’s position on immigration reform is ridiculous. He’s just a xenophobic bigot who hates right wing propaganda.” This is an ad hominem attack because it attempts to undermine Mike’s position by implying that he holds bigoted views, rather than discussing the actual merits of his argument.
“Lisa’s analysis of the housing market is flawed. She’s just a real estate agent who only cares about making a profit.” This is an ad hominem attack because it attempts to undermine Lisa’s analysis by implying that she is motivated by greed, rather than evaluating the logic and evidence of her argument.
“I don’t believe a word of Tim’s economic theory, he’s just a socialist who wants to redistribute wealth.” This is an ad hominem attack because it attempts to undermine Tim’s theory by attacking his political beliefs, rather than addressing the logic and evidence of his argument.
“Don’t trust the opinion of the scientist, he’s just a hired gun working for a big corporation.” This is an ad hominem attack because it attempts to undermine the credibility of the scientist by implying that he is motivated by financial gain, rather than evaluating the logic and evidence of his argument.

Summary

All the above examples are ad hominem logical fallacies, because they attempt to undermine the credibility or trustworthiness of the person they are attacking, rather than addressing the substance of their argument or evidence. It is a logical fallacy because it distracts from the real issue at hand and it can be used in any subject matter. Ad hominem is a very common and informal fallacy and often used in debates, politics, and everyday conversation. It is important to be able to recognize it and avoid it in order to have a fair and productive discussion.